Trump’s Plan For Flag Burners Could Save You Thousands of Dollars

(ANTIMEDIA)  — President-elect Donald Trump once again dominated headlines on Tuesday when he tweeted, “Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag – if they do, there must be consequences – perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!”

Social media and news outlets were quick to point out that not only was his threat unconstitutional, but it had already been attempted to some degree by Hillary Clinton when she introduced the Flag Protection Act of 2005.

But what if he actually managed to do it?

The thought is terrifying for many, but not as many as some might think. The number of Americans voluntarily renouncing their U.S. citizenship is at an all-time high, and the number continues to climb despite the costly and painstaking process to do so. If Trump was actually able to revoke citizenship for burning the flag, he’d be saving thousands of Americans a $2,350 renunciation fee, raised in 2014 from $450. The State Department claimed the 422% hike was to cover the costs of their increased workload.

The expatriation process is also timely and tedious and generally requires the individual to “prove 5 years of U.S. tax compliance,” which is ironic given Trump’s past refusal to do so himself.

Whether the president-elect’s tweet was merely a knee-jerk emotional reaction, “trolling,” or a legitimate threat, the implication of the president of the United States violating the constitutional rights of the American people on a whim is nothing to be taken lightly.

This article (Trump’s Plan For Flag Burners Could Save You Thousands of Dollars)  is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Josie Wales and Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us