(ANTIWAR.COM) — The Trump Administration has committed to seeing a regime change in Venezuela, aiming to oust President Maduro and replace him with opposition leader Juan Guaido, seen as more friendly to US interests.
But previous talk of Maduro as a “gangster” in and of himself is starting to fall by the wayside. Instead, officials, particularly Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, are presenting the enemy in Venezuela as socialism in general, making this an ideological fight.
This somewhat changes the tone, if not the intentions, of the US push for regime change, centering it not just on ousting a single government, but demanding Venezuela as a whole abandon its present ruling ideology in favor of one more palatable to US interests.
That’s a much different demand, and makes Venezuela’s decision to expel the US diplomats from Caracas less surprising. Yet Pompeo, who had long defended leaving the diplomats there, tried to talk around this expulsion, presenting the withdrawal as a US decision related to the worsening situation within Venezuela.
This, adds to constant US threats to resort to invading Venezuela militarily to impose regime change. Pompeo presented the US diplomats as a “constraint” on policy that is no longer in place, suggesting they are nearing the point of intervention.
The New York Times seemed to be backing up the argument that the US should escalate the situation, arguing that having backed Guaido and failed to get him into power could be similarly to President Obama not following through on 2012 threats against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. This seems likely to just encourage President Trump on a military path, determined not to look weak.
These articles were chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us