President of the Philippines Slams Alleged US Plot to Oust Him

Controversial President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines called U.S. ambassadors “spies” amid local news reports that the U.S. was seeking to destabilize his government.

(TRUEACTIVISTJust as the U.S. announced its “retaliation” against Russia for allegedly interfering in the U.S. election, new information began to emerge about yet another alleged U.S. attempt to destabilize a democratically elected government. This Tuesday, the Manila Times reported that a “highly placed source” said that a former US ambassador to the Philippines had created a “blueprint” for actions intended to destabilize Rodrigo Duterte’s government. The ambassador in question was Philip Goldberg, who just recently stepped down from the ambassador position. Goldberg had outlined various strategies to be carried out over an 18-month period in the document including co-opting the media, the military, regional allies, and senior government officials as well as actively supporting the opposition. These are all hallmarks of the U.S.’ regime change policy, a policy which has no shortage of examples.

Duterte, prior to these latest revelations, had expressed his dislike for Goldberg in his characteristically vulgar style, calling him a “gay son of a bitch.” He had also called out Goldberg’s history of undermining governments on several recent television interviews as Goldberg was previously expelled from Bolivia in 2008 when Bolivian President Evo Morales accused him of funding the opposition and orchestrating “color revolution” street protests.

In the time since this latest revelation, Duterte has expressed his cynicism about the real motives of U.S. diplomats. In a television interview cited by Reuters, he expressed his belief that “most of the ambassadors of the United States, but not all, are not really professional ambassadors. At the same time they are spying, they are connected with the CIA.” He then asserted that “the ambassador of a country is the number one spy. But there are ambassador of the U.S., their forte is really to undermine governments.” The U.S. has denied the accusations. U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia and the Pacific, Daniel Russel, rejected the Manila Times article, saying “The United States respects the sovereignty of the Philippines and the democratic choices made by the Philippine people.” However, such statements are dubious given the U.S.’ penchant for regime change. Indeed, the U.S. is confirmed to have interfered in foreign elections 81 times between 1946 and 2000 and such interventions were carried out covertly 65% of the time.

It would be no surprise if the U.S. was targeting Duterte’s presidency. Duterte has openly expressed disdain for outgoing President Obama, who he recently told to “go to hell.” He has also expressed his desire to end the long-standing alliance between the U.S. and Philippines and demanded the removal of US troops stationed in his country. Well aware of the consequences for angering the US, Duterte has since been pivoting towards China and Russia to secure new, key alliances while also expressing his optimism regarding a Trump presidency.

This article (President of the Philippines Slams Alleged US Plot to Oust Him) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Whitney Webb and

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us