Pentagon: No Attempt Made to Underplay Casualties in January 8 Iran Attack

(ANTIWAR.COM— Pentagon officials denied that they made any effort to downplay or delay the revelation of American military casualties in the January 8 Iranian missile strike on the Ayn al-Asad airbase in Iraq.

President Trump reported on January 8 that there were no American casualties, and this was the official story for over a week. On Thursday, the Pentagon confirmed that 11 US troops had actually been taken out of Iraq for treatment for possible concussions related to the strike.

There was no explanation for the eight solid days between the incident and the Pentagon having casualties figures. They insist that not only were they not trying to hide them, but that Defense Secretary Mark Esper only found out about them a few hours before the American public did.

It is hard to imagine this as an oversight, considering it was a high-profile attack, and 11 concussed US soldiers don’t just get sent to Kuwait and/or Germany without someone knowing about it. The lack of knowledge at the top would almost have to be a conscious decision not to hear about them.

It isn’t hard to see why, with the administration choosing to deescalate with Iran after the attack that they would just as soon not make the casualties public at the time.

By Jason Ditz / Republished with permission / ANTIWAR.COM / Report a typo

These articles were chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in these articles are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us