(ANTIMEDIA) Following Michael Flynn’s forced resignation as Donald Trump’s national security advisor, it seemed as though neoconservatives had completely infiltrated the Trump administration. Flynn’s replacement is a staunch anti-Russian imperialist, General H.R. McMaster.
In his new post, McMaster went to work immediately and began to shake up Trump’s National Security Council, including booting the president’s chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, off the council. Not long after, McMaster briefed Trump on military strike proposals against the Syrian government, something Bannon would have completely opposed.
“Bannon is a core architect of ‘America first’ unilateralism and has no interest in continuing forever-wars that lack support among the base in the region,” said Ian Bremmer, the president of the international consulting firm Eurasia Group.
However, things have not gone so smoothly for McMaster despite his keen insistence on playing such a prominent role within the Trump administration. His military strike proposals — troop deployment proposals, unannounced trips to Afghanistan, and his overhyped portrayal in the media as “an accomplished military strategist and an adept White House infighter” — may be short-lived if Bannon and Bannon’s loyalists have any say in the matter.
According to Foreign Policy, there are opponents of McMaster within the White House who want him out. Supposedly, the efforts to derail McMaster through anonymous leaks to the press (ironically, how McMaster secured his job in the first place), focus on McMaster’s policy towards Afghanistan, which could see an additional 5,000 troops deployed to the war-torn nation.
“McMaster is pushing this Afghanistan policy through. I think some people are giving him the rope to get it through, hoping he hangs himself with it,” one senior intelligence official said, as reported by Foreign Policy.
McMaster’s strategy would give overwhelming power to the Pentagon to determine troop levels, as well as broader authority to use airstrikes. Apparently, increasing troops incessantly and bombing Afghanistan into oblivion hasn’t been tried enough in the past.
According to Bloomberg’s Eli Lake, White House officials said Trump himself has clashed with McMaster directly in front of other staff. Lake reported:
“McMaster’s allies and adversaries inside the White House tell me that Trump is disillusioned with him. This professional military officer has failed to read the president — by not giving him a chance to ask questions during briefings, at times even lecturing Trump.”
However, Lake noted that the White House issued a statement from Trump last Sunday stating, “I couldn’t be happier with H.R. [McMaster]. He’s doing a terrific job.”
This is in light of the fact that, according to Lake’s sources, Trump has privately expressed regret for choosing McMaster.
As much as the neoconservatives would like to think that by swamping Trump they can officially dictate his actions, Trump was always going to be the unscripted “wildcard” president. Easily swayed by emotion, with a brain completely detached from his own mouth, Trump was never going to satisfy both camps vying for control of his decision-making. For example, the president recently displayed a brilliant Trump-esque moment reminiscent of his election campaign when he announced that the missile defense system he deployed to South Korea (known as THAAD) would have to be paid for by South Korea.
The Wall Street Journal reported that McMaster called his South Korean counterpart to assure him that the president’s threat was not an official policy. According to Lake, these White House officials reported that in response, Trump “screamed at McMaster on a phone call, accusing him of undercutting efforts to get South Korea to pay its fair share.”
According to Lake’s informants, this is not an isolated incident. Lake noted that over the weekend, McMaster did not accompany Trump to meet with Australian prime minister Michael Turnbull but was accompanied by the outgoing deputy national security advisor, K.T. McFarland, instead.
As Foreign Policy reports, the National Security Council is still full of “Flynnstones,” a nickname given to people hand-picked to serve on the Council by McMaster’s predecessor, Michael Flynn. In that sense, McFarland is seen as a nuisance to the McMaster camp, yet not even Trump supports McFarland’s removal, as he “likes McFarland and has openly questioned why she’s leaving,” according to Foreign Policy.
Unless McMaster can completely shake the council up in his image, there will always be infighting between these two camps. Further, McMaster is an active-duty three-star general, overseeing a cabinet and military filled with four-star generals.
As Lake reported, a Flynnstone named Derek Harvey compiled a list of “Obama holdovers at the National Security Council who were suspected of leaking to the press.” Bannon and Trump pushed McMaster to fire these people but McMaster refused.
For the people of the Middle East and Asia, McMaster’s impending downfall may, in fact, be a good thing. As the Trump presidency continues to unravel like the spectacle it has become, continue to expect the unexpected. As stated by Lake:
“For now the White House is saying the president and his national security adviser are in sync. Trump said in his statement to me that he couldn’t be happier with the general. Of course, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway assured the public in February that Trump had full confidence in McMaster’s predecessor. Only a few hours later, he was forced to resign.”
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us