Israel Shoots Two More Gaza Journalists During Friday’s Protests

(MEMO– Two journalists have been wounded in Gaza as they covered weekly Friday protests taking place as part of the Great March of Return.

Mohammed Abu Qadous was injured in the leg are a tear gas canister was fired at him by Israeli soldiers on the Gaza border. Al-Mayadeen correspondent Ahmad Ghanem was also injured in the east of the Strip while reporting on the protest. Both reporters, who were wearing clearly marked press vests, were quickly taken to nearby medical tents to receive treatment and are believed to be in a stable condition.

At least 14 other Palestinians have also been injured so far today by sniper fire and tear gas, as they protested for the 43rd Friday under the banner “Unity is the key to victory”.

Tens of thousands of Gazan have continued to gather at the weekly protests, despite Israel’s violent suppression of the rallies that injure scores of people every Friday. Hamas spokesman Hazem Qasim said the ongoing demonstrations “confirm our people’s commitment to the path of struggle until our objectives are met”.

Israel has also consistently targeted journalists covering the Great March of Return. At least two reporters in Gaza, including MEMO contributor Yaser Murtaja, were killed by Israeli forces last year; at least 80 others were wounded by sniper fire. Journalists on the ground say they have been deliberately targeted by soldiers, as Israel does not want its brutal crackdown to be exposed.

More than 250 Palestinians have been killed, and over 25,000 have been injured by Israeli forces since last March. Gazans have been calling for lifting the 11-year-old Israeli siege and for their right to return to the homes from which their families were forced from during the 1948 Nakba, which led to the creation of the state of Israel.

Creative Commons / Middle East Monitor / Report a typo

This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us