State Department Action Group ‘echoes the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq’, Iranian American advocacy organisation says.
(MEE) — US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced on Thursday the establishment of the Iran Action Group, a task-force to coordinate all of President Donald Trump’s efforts against Iran.
The group will be led by Brian Hook, a State Department official who served as an adviser to John Bolton in 2006, when the Iran hawk was US ambassador to the United Nations.
“The Iran Action Group will be responsible for directing, reviewing and coordinating all aspects of the State Department’s Iran-related activity, and will report directly to me,” Pompeo said at a news conference.
In May, Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal, despite the protests of European allies. The agreement saw Iran drastically scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for lifting economic sanctions.
Washington re-imposed sanctions on Iran earlier this month, with more measures against the Islamic Republic’s oil industry set to take place in November.
On Thursday, Pompeo slammed the deal as “flawed”, vowing to pressure Tehran in a campaign of support for the “long-suffering Iranian people”.
“Our hope is that one day soon we can reach a new agreement with Iran,” Pompeo said. “But we must see major changes in the regime’s behaviour both inside and outside of its borders.”
The National Iranian American Council (NIAC), a Washington-based advocacy group, slammed the establishment of the Iran Action Group, calling it an attempt to implement Pompeo’s “dangerous vision” for Iran without the scrutiny of State Department officials.
“The Iran Action Group echoes the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, when the George W Bush administration launched the ‘Office of Special Plans’ out of the Pentagon to cherry-pick intelligence and make the case for a bloody war,” NIAC president Jamal Abdi said in a statement.
“It is particularly alarming that Brian Hook, a person who touted his ties to John Bolton and oversaw a disastrous deterioration of Iran policy, is tasked with escalating tension with Iran and sabotaging diplomatic opportunities.”
Hook said the goal of his division will be to execute Trump’s Iran strategy to protect the security of the US and its allies and to “promote a brighter future for the Iranian people”.
“This team is committed to a strong global effort to change the Iranian regime’s behavior,” Hook said. “The Iran regime has been a force of instability and violence,” he added.
Hook had been negotiating with Washington’s European allies to comply with US sanctions on Iran’s oil sector.
The State Department official had come under criticism in April for suggesting that Washington was no longer bound by the nuclear deal because it was signed by President Barack Obama who was no longer in office.
“This JCPOA is not a treaty, it’s not an executive agreement. It has no signatures. It has no legal status. It is a political commitment by an administration that’s no longer in office,” he said then, according to NPR.
Joe Macaron, a fellow at the Arab Center Washington DC, said the Action Group will have a “significant impact” on US policy towards Iran.
“The primary purpose of this group is restricted to serving as a bureaucratic hub for a disconnected US strategy and managing the complex process of appeasing or pressuring countries around the world to abide by US sanctions on Iran,” Macaron told Middle East Eye via email.
He said such units are not uncommon within the State Department to manage relations with certain countries, but typically they are not officially announced.
Despite the Trump administration’s “bombastic rhetoric” on Iran, Macaron said he does not see any resemblance to Bush’s policy on Iraq in the lead-up to the 2003 invasion.
“Yet, the White House is gambling with a diplomatic offensive to force the Iranian regime to the negotiation table, an approach that might have unintended consequences or lead to miscalculations on both sides.”
This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us