(ANTIMEDIA) When Louis Weiss, the former supervisor of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), was interviewed by USA Today’s Brad Heath, the former DEA employee had no problem discussing the government agencies’ dependence on stolen property in order to pad their budgets and increase discretionary spending.
At the DEA, Weiss told USA Today, they “count on [civil asset forfeiture] as part of the budget.”
“Basically,” the former DEA supervisor said, “you’ve got to feed the monster.”
Several law enforcement agencies, including the DEA, often use civil asset forfeiture to seize cash from Americans who aren’t guilty of committing a crime. But recently, the DEA was caught taking a further step to meet its forfeiture ambitions: data mining traveler information.
The process is fairly simple. In order to spot travelers with large sums of cash in hand, agents profile “passengers on Amtrak trains and nearly every major U.S. airline, drawing on reports from a network of travel-industry informants that extends from ticket counters to back offices.”
In many cases, USA Today added, agents single “out passengers for questioning or searches for reasons as seemingly benign as traveling one-way to California or having paid for a ticket in cash.”
To Tech Dirt, this new revelation adds “another layer of surveillance to the traveling experience.” Ever since the creation of the TSA, American travelers have been subject to unconstitutional searches over terrorism concerns. But now, they’re also being scouted for cash.
But the DEA’s purpose is not to take cash from innocent Americans. Instead, the DEA was created to focus on taking drug-related criminals off the street.
While one may argue against the DEA’s mission on several grounds, it’s still important to highlight the agency’s apparent lack of focus considering its agents aren’t doing what its mission statement claims. Instead of dedicating its resources to going after drug lords, agents steal travelers’ money and let the alleged suspects go.
That was the case with Christelle Tillerson, a traveler who had $25,000 seized by the DEA while waiting to board a plane to Chicago from Detroit.
“The Justice Department said in a court filing that agents became interested in Tillerson after they ‘received information’ that she was headed to Los Angeles on a one-way ticket,” USA Today reported. But Tillerson explained “her boyfriend had withdrawn the money from his U.S. Postal Service retirement account so that she could buy a truck.” To DEA agents, that answer wasn’t good enough.
Because Tillerson was an ex-convict with an arrest under her belt for “driving a load of marijuana into the United States from Mexico,” the DEA seized the cash. They let her go after the ordeal.
Once Tillerson was able to prove her side of the story, “the Justice Department agreed to return the money, minus $4,000.” The DEA had concluded its agents deserved to keep a “small percentage” of the cash.
Tech Dirt reports that airlines refuse to work with the DEA to sniff out cash-strapped travelers. Unfortunately, this resistance does nothing to deter cash-hungry agents.
Going around the airlines, DEA agents often find “airline employees willing to peruse itineraries — or pass them on to the DEA — for a cut of the cash.” In order to have a database at its disposal, the DEA created a network of informants “that extends from ticket counters to back offices,” effectively creating “a cash-focused surveillance network.” Tech Dirt adds that, among government agents, “[c]ash is king. Everything else about the drug war — indictments, convictions, etc. — is just a sideline.”
This article (The DEA Is Literally Using Surveillance to Get Better at Stealing from Travelers) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Alice Salles and theAntiMedia.org. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11 pm Eastern/8 pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, please email the error and name of the article to firstname.lastname@example.org.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us