(FAIR) After the justified uproar over pro-Trump Sinclair Broadcast Group forcing its scores of affiliates to humiliate themselves by reading an on-air script condemning “misleading” news, one would think other media outlets would be a little more careful not to mimic such behavior. Nonetheless, MSNBC—which rightfully tore into Sinclair Broadcast (4/2/18) for having its news reporters read off a corporate script—did a toned-down version of the same thing last Friday on Morning Joe (4/20/18).
Comcast corporate forced its nominally independent pundits and news anchors of Morning Joe to air a cultish 8-minute commercial for Comcast’s “Comcast Cares Day,” the lowlight of which was MSNBC host Al Sharpton comparing Comcast to Nelson Mandela:
“This is, I think, the way we can bring the world to where Mandela wanted us, where corporations don’t become expansive and influential just for personal wealth, but for a purpose, so that we have the ability to do good.”
Comcast property MSNBC having its nominally independent analysts and hosts doing a cultish Comcast commercial was bad enough but Al Sharpton claiming Comcast was carrying on the work of Nelson Mandela was uh something else https://t.co/KrE5X5BsN4 pic.twitter.com/FLI3f116vs
— Adam H. Johnson (@adamjohnsonNYC) April 22, 2018
The section was presented as news, though branded with Comcast’s logo and intro music. Anchor Nicolle Wallace began by reading from a Comcast press release that described “Comcast Cares Day” as “the nation’s largest single-day corporate volunteer effort”: “It is believed to be the largest single-day corporate volunteer event,” she insisted. “Believed” by whom? Well, Comcast’s marketing department, which is evidently enough to assert it as fact.
Virtually the same language was used by other Comcast properties, including NBC’s Today show (4/21/18, “the nation’s largest single-day corporate volunteer effort”) and Boston NBC 10 (4/21/18, “the nation’s largest single-day corporate volunteer effort”).
As Splinter News’ David Boddiger (4/22/18) noted, the list of outlets forced to read off the Comcast script didn’t stop there:
“NBC affiliates across the nation “pitched in.” NBC Bay Area, for example, ran a PR–sounding segment that was a lot like all of the other ones. So did NBC 5 in Fort Worth, TX, NBC 10 in Philadelphia, NBC 4 in Los Angeles, NBC 5 in Chicago and NBC Connecticut, to name a few. Other media outlets joined in, including ABC’s WTXL in Tallahassee, Florida, the Denver Postand the Tennessean, among others.”
A general set of talking points was handed down by Comcast corporate to highlight how wholesome and caring Comcast is, and the company’s supposedly independent news outlets read it almost verbatim–a useful piece of image curation, since Comcast repeatedly tops lists of the most-hated corporations in the United States.
Editors and producers frequently assure media consumers there’s a “church and state divide” in the newsroom separating reporting from the commercial side of the business. Based on this creepy series of infomercials, one is compelled to wonder what influence, both subtle and direct, Comcast corporate has on its properties’ coverage on a day-to-day basis.
FAIR (2/19/14) noted the softball coverage Morning Joe gave to the attempted takeover of Time Warnerby Comcast; “Comcast seems to be doing everything right over the past four or five years” was how host Joe Scarborough prefaced one question to his boss, Comcast CEO Brian Roberts.
Others have complained about MSNBC’s squelching coverage of the Trans Pacific Partnership in 2015 and 2016, a “free trade” agreement mostly unpopular among progressives but lobbied for aggressively by Comcast. MSNBC even cut off Bernie Sanders in February 2016 when he was giving a speech against the TPP, and fired the one host opposed to it, Ed Schultz, who was responsible not only for almost all of MSNBC’s coverage of TPP but almost all of cable news’ coverage. (The corporate owners of MSNBC’s rivals, CNN and Fox News, also lobbied for TPP.)
The Tonight Show, Comcast-owned NBC’s late night program, brought on then-President Barack Obama to do a pitch for TPP, which host Jimmy Fallon “slow-jammed” to–a segment that was then featured on Vox, a website whose major investor is Comcast (FAIR.org, 6/11/16). Vox earlier ran an “explainer” on how much money its corporate backer saves consumers (FAIR.org, 9/9/15): “Comcast may not be much loved by its customers, but it has the weight of their collective voice in its bargaining over carriage fees,” the website reported.
Perhaps Comcast public relations reps would argue that dozens of Comcast“news” outlets reading off a Comcast script isn’t as sinister as what Sinclair did, because Comcast was promoting “corporate volunteerism” rather than Trump’s agenda. This is true as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go very far. There are presumably dozens of corporate volunteer events every week MSNBC doesn’t cover; the reason they had a full on PR blitz for this one was because they were exploiting the credibility of their news programs to help polish the image of one of those most-loathed corporations on Earth. Whether it’s the Trump administration or sleazy cable companies, news outlets should be reporting news, not doctoring up thinly veiled press releases for their corporate owners.
This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us