South Korea Praised for ‘Masterful’ Diplomacy as Trump Demands ‘Credit’

(COMMONDREAMS— While President Donald Trump was quick to implore the media to give him “credit” for the announcement late Thursday that he is set to meet with Kim Jong-un in person some time in May, analysts and anti-war groups argued in response to the news that it was South Korea’s persistent diplomatic efforts—not Trump’s “fire and fury” threats—that led to the potentially historic breakthrough.

“Kim Jong-un reiterating his country’s commitments not to test nuclear weapons or ballistic missiles during ongoing diplomacy is excellent news, as is President Trump accepting Kim’s invitation to meet in person for the first time,” said Peace Action president Kevin Martin in a statement on Thursday. “But let the record show, it wasn’t Trump’s bluster or the ‘maximum pressure’ campaign that brought North Korea to the negotiating table, it was South Korean President Moon Jae-in’s willingness to engage without preconditions.”

Christine Ahn, a Korea expert and founder of the anti-war group Women Cross DMZ, echoed Peace Action’s stance in a series of tweets on Thursday, arguing that crediting Trump’s aggressive tactics and U.S. sanctions—as some media outlets did in response to the news—is “a dangerous rewriting of what happened.”

Thursday’s announcement—delivered by South Korean officials outside the White House—comes on the heels of a meeting between a South Korean delegation and Kim Jong-un in Pyongyang earlier this week, during which Kim vowed to halt missile tests during diplomatic talks.

As Common Dreams reported on Thursday, a coalition of grassroots peace organizations sent an open letter to the White House following the meeting calling on Trump to reciprocate North Korea’s diplomatic overtures by canceling planned war games close to North Korea’s borders.

In a statement celebrating the growing possibility of deescalation of nuclear tensions on the Korean Peninsula, Beatrice Fihn, executive director of International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), argued that lasting peace and security can only be achieved if the U.S. and North Korea “join the majority of countries in pursuing permanent denuclearization through The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.”

By Jake Johnson / Creative Commons / Common Dreams / Report a typo

This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us

    7