March 20, 2015
(ANTIMEDIA) Why would you go for seven per cent when you can get 50 to 100 per cent increases in yield without having to use genetically modified seeds?
The South Australian Agriculture Minister has just reported “amazing” results after trialing a new soil program. Minister Leon Bignell describes using technology that works with the soil and other organic matter. This type of innovation, that he calls an “evolution in science” abounds over genetic engineering, he said.
The results of the following trial experiment strengthened his view that a moratorium on GM technology should remain indefinitely as it proves that GMOs are not needed. Incidentally, this year’s government test run was called “New Horizons” and some of the trial sites boasted a 300% increase in yields.
Minister Bignell – who has stood with protesters against GM technology – said of the upgraded ag technique:
Instead of using the top five centimetres of the soil, you go down to 50cm or even deeper.
You put clay in it when it’s needed, you put organic matter where it’s needed as well.
We’re seeing [yield] increases of 50 per cent, 100 per cent, even 300 per cent in some of the cases.
Even though he’s received pressure to lift the ban and use the GM tech for weeds and pests, he doesn’t believe that’s the solution. He moves forward with vigor when he gets accused of being “left behind” – a favorite term of elites pushing an agenda.
“The public in most places of the world aren’t convinced” about GM technology,” he said. He proudly sees being GMO-free as forging ahead and entering new markets.
Apparently, a bulk of the pressure is coming from State body Grain Producers SA who say they should be able to choose their products and they are not seeing monetary benefits to Bignell’s plans yet. Under Bignell’s lead, the right to choose does not include untested GM tech, chemicals and future unknown ecological problems.
Bignell says the program isn’t a fluke – it can be replicated and he plans to show the grain producers just that. He is now in communications with grain handlers in other countries as well as meetings in Switzerland. In China, he could see the increasing use of Australian GMO-free ingredients. He is in talks about branding products as South Australian GM-free grain.
The only thing that worries this writer is when he says:
That’s when the real returns will start coming in and hopefully they’re passed on to the farmer.
Hopefully? Bignell, you need to know they will. You need to make sure the farmers profit from these programs or say good-bye to a GM-free status.
For a 4-minute audio, go here.
If you look at GM and the promises around increases of about seven per cent in yields; why would you go for seven per cent when you can get 50 to 100 per cent increases in yield without having to use genetically modified seeds?
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us