May 11, 2016
(ANTIWAR) The House Appropriations Committee has today unveiled its draft version of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a $575 billion bill that includes some $59 billion worth of money for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), the controversial fund which the Pentagon is allowed to shuffle around.
This actually looks like a cut from last year’s $612 billion bill, but provides a deliberately misleading figure, as it includes only the first four months of 2017 war funding, with the assumption that whoever wins the November election will seek “emergency funding” to cover the rest of the year.
The White House has expressed opposition to this plan, calling it “grossly irresponsible,” though at the moment they have not said anything about potentially vetoing the bill. This is just one of several topics of controversy in the bill.
Another major issue is the question of forcing women to register for the draft. At present, the new NDAA includes language that would require all women aged 18-26 to register, in a move presented as pushing for “equality.”
Rep. Pete Sessions (R – TX) and several others have expressed opposition to the expansion of the Selective Service program, and Sessions is pushing an amendment to remove the language from the bill. Other bills are in process aimed at eliminating the Selective Service program outright.
The House bill also is setting up a battle with the Senate on the question of a military pay raise, as the House bill aims at a 2.1% pay raise for troops, while the Senate is endorsing President Obama’s own proposal, which is a smaller 1.6% raise.
This article (House Hides Most War Funding in NDAA Bill Scheme) originally appeared on AntiWar.com and was used with permission. Anti-Media Radio airs weeknights at 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. If you spot a typo, email email@example.com.
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us