Watch: The Moment Fox News Caught Itself Broadcasting Fake News on Live TV

Over the course of one broadcast, the Fox News host went from denying the New York Times‘ report to confirming it to suggesting it was insignificant.

(COMMONDREAMSViewers of the Sean Hannity Show watched in real-time Thursday night as their host was forced to admit that reports of President Donald Trump’s attempt to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller were true, after he’d spent part of the broadcast attacking the New York Times’ story.

Later, countless people online witnessed Hannity’s coverage as the clip went viral.

Early in the show, Sean Hannity dismissed the Times’ report that Trump had ordered the dismissal of Mueller, who stepped in to run the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia after the president fired former FBI director James Comey last spring.

The New York Times is trying to distract you,” Hannity told his audience. “They have a story that Trump wanted Mueller fired sometime last June, and our sources, and I’ve checked in with many of them, they’re not confirming that tonight…And how many times has the New York Times and others gotten it wrong?”

He later said that his sources could indeed confirm that the story was true.

Watch:

Although Hannity’s tone in his first mention of the story suggested that the Times’report, if true, would be a significant development, he took on a dismissive attitude when acknowledging that the president wanted to fire the official in charge of investigating him.

“Yeah, maybe Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for conflict. Does he not have the right to raise those questions?” he said, shrugging, before quickly changing the subject to a high-speed car chase in Arizona.

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have said that attempting to fire Mueller is a red line that the president must not cross.

On social media, Hannity’s backtracking garnered attention from journalists and critics.

By Julia Conley / Creative Commons / Common Dreams / Report a typo

This article was chosen for republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect Anti-Media editorial policy.

Since you’re here…

…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.

If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us

    9